Tantreghan
Grandmaster
I just read the rda rules as posted here, and that all looks fair to me.
http://www.uoforum.com/threads/new-rda-multi-client-banning-removal.90050/
Buuuuuut i sure hope that anyone who broke them rules before this was posted (and i KNOW squad wasnt the only ones doing RDAs illegally, there are MULTIPLE others whom just didnt get caught) are getting let off with fair warning. It is NOT fair to have multiple people doing rdas illegally and punish one or two groups of people with a set of rules re-published after the fact. Everyone learned their lesson, so lets let the past be the past and focus on the rules that have been re-published at hand.
no im not i squad, $, eqms or any other guild known to be have done things by bending the rules. I simply heard a rumor that people are going to be charged with these new punishments, when what they did happened before the new consequences were posted.
Everyone knows its not worth the risk now.
PS its xmas season so lets try to be nice to each other
Thoughts? and is the rumor true? @Shane
http://www.uoforum.com/threads/new-rda-multi-client-banning-removal.90050/
Buuuuuut i sure hope that anyone who broke them rules before this was posted (and i KNOW squad wasnt the only ones doing RDAs illegally, there are MULTIPLE others whom just didnt get caught) are getting let off with fair warning. It is NOT fair to have multiple people doing rdas illegally and punish one or two groups of people with a set of rules re-published after the fact. Everyone learned their lesson, so lets let the past be the past and focus on the rules that have been re-published at hand.
no im not i squad, $, eqms or any other guild known to be have done things by bending the rules. I simply heard a rumor that people are going to be charged with these new punishments, when what they did happened before the new consequences were posted.
Everyone knows its not worth the risk now.
PS its xmas season so lets try to be nice to each other
Thoughts? and is the rumor true? @Shane