Spell Damage Mitiagation WHEN:

[Beaver Burgler]

totally have to agree with you, except I think there was more action at the bridge before, albeit less organized.

problem is, if you got rid of steam and sallos by enforcing razor, people would just go back to EUO and then it's users would have a big advantage over legit players. Better to simply allow steam, and then try to block certain functions.

TBH I liked OP suggestion better when it was a simply damage mitigation for any players in a group that were within a certain # of tiles close to eachother, with the same 50% max decrease for 5 players in the same close vicinity of eachother, regardless of weather or not they were agressed with anyone.

BUT you see, the problem is that the PvP manager is biased because this suggestion interferes with his personal playstyle, so we're just going to have to wait for him to resign before we can have better balanced PvP overall on this shard.

Except you are also biased. The fact that you prefer not to group up in larger parties/guilds means that eqms's playstyle doesn't suit your play preferences so you are calling foul and trying to force others to play as you do.

UO is a sandbox nobody should be forced to play a specific playstyle.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[LoNE WoLF]

Except you are also biased. The fact that you prefer not to group up in larger parties/guilds means that eqms's playstyle doesn't suit your play preferences so you are calling foul and trying to force others to play as you do.

UO is a sandbox nobody should be forced to play a specific playstyle.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

He doesn't understand the concept of a world outside his pathetic mindset. Ignore his posts. He's a major hypocrite. Wouldn't surprise me if he isn't playing with a full deck.

 

[wreckognize]

Except you are also biased. The fact that you prefer not to group up in larger parties/guilds means that eqms's playstyle doesn't suit your play preferences so you are calling foul and trying to force others to play as you do.

UO is a sandbox nobody should be forced to play a specific playstyle.

Yet they're being forced to play in groups because it's such an advantage, and one that has gone unchecked by the game mechanics.

Note that this fix doesn't force players to play solo. It's only trying to balance the two playstyles to make them both viable.

Right, @LoNE WoLF ? lawl

 

[Winstonian]

Yet they're being forced to play in groups because it's such an advantage, and one that has gone unchecked by the game mechanics.

Note that this fix doesn't force players to play solo. It's only trying to balance the two playstyles to make them both viable.

Right, @LoNE WoLF ? lawl

Huh? How is anyone forced to play in groups?

 

[wreckognize]

Huh? How is anyone forced to play in groups?

 

[Winstonian]

Exactly. You don't have a valid response because - again - your bullshit isn't true.

 

[wreckognize]

Everything from wanting to be a contender in RDAs or champs, to being able to stay alive in despise level 1 or brit bridge these days. So many other aspects of the game are forcing large group that it's virtually impossible to do well as a solo player. Hell, these guys even roll groups on the poker table these days.

 

[Beaver Burgler]

Yet they're being forced to play in groups because it's such an advantage, and one that has gone unchecked by the game mechanics.

Note that this fix doesn't force players to play solo. It's only trying to balance the two playstyles to make them both viable.

Right, @LoNE WoLF ? lawl

You are not forced to play in a group. Also with your method just don't party up and there is no damage mitigation, glaring whole in a concept that is knee jerk because you want to force people to play as you do.

He doesn't understand the concept of a world outside his pathetic mindset. Ignore his posts. He's a major hypocrite. Wouldn't surprise me if he isn't playing with a full deck.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Beaver Burgler]

Everything from wanting to be a contender in RDAs or champs, to being able to stay alive in despise level 1 or brit bridge these days. So many other aspects of the game are forcing large group that it's virtually impossible to do well as a solo player. Hell, these guys even roll groups on the poker table these days.

How do you define large group? I have been back for 5 months and have hardly seen group fights large than 5 or so on each side (minus champ or rda).

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Winstonian]

Everything from wanting to be a contender in RDAs or champs, to being able to stay alive in despise level 1 or brit bridge these days. So many other aspects of the game are forcing large group that it's virtually impossible to do well as a solo player. Hell, these guys even roll groups on the poker table these days.

Garbage.

If you want to solo PvP, you can do that. Duel? You can do that too. Farm? Sure. There's content where groups provide an advantage, but no one is forcing you to participate in those things.

 

[wreckognize]

Garbage.

If you want to solo PvP, you can do that. Duel? You can do that too. Farm? Sure. There's content where groups provide an advantage, but no one is forcing you to participate in those things.

lol you're garbage. Wanna duel?? I'll dirt you anytime you want scrub.

 

[Beaver Burgler]

lol you're garbage. Wanna duel?? I'll dirt you anytime you want scrub.

Stick to your topic and debate it. Don't result to personal attacks and distract from the argument that this is a bad idea.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Winstonian]

lol you're garbage. Wanna duel?? I'll dirt you anytime you want scrub.

Sure, I'll duel. Pots or no pots?

I like this, though. You make a bad point. A bunch of people point out how bad it is. You get mad and start challenging others to duels. Sounds reasonable.

 

[wreckognize]

Stick to your topic and debate it. Don't result to personal attacks and distract from the argument that this is a bad idea.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

All you're asking me to do is repeat myself anyways. I've already pointed out why your argument, that this would force a certain playstyle, is invalid because it doesn't.

 

[wreckognize]

Sure, I'll duel. Pots or no pots?

5x. im at the pits now, toon is Strandedness

 

[Beaver Burgler]

All you're asking me to do is repeat myself anyways. I've already pointed out why your argument, that this would force a certain playstyle, is invalid because it doesn't.

So how does enacting new mechanics that penalizes groups not force groups into a new play style...

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Winstonian]

5x. im at the pits now, toon is Strandedness

5x. Interesting. Haven't done it in forever, but I'll fight regardless. No pots, right?

 

[Afro Man]

I did not. I've never used anything but razor. Pardon my ignorance.

hahaha im in your boat

 

[Beaver Burgler]

Either way your suggeston doesn't even solve what you are complaining about. So there is no point arguing it because when it is implemented you will just complain it's broke.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

 

[Winstonian]

5x. im at the pits now, toon is Strandedness

Alright. You won under your conditions. My offer: 7x, anything goes, Wrong roof?