Get a house. Secure a chest. Bingo.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk
It is really just a laziness tax. One that I would gladly pay (= if it were a gold sink feature. Maybe limit it to linking two characters. I have a house and plenty of secure containers and such but I am also lazy.Get a house. Secure a chest. Bingo.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk
We're playing the closest emulated original version of UO. Not Diablo III. Its not being lazy its being a noob and not experiencing UO for what it is. Another option for you is to make a 2nd account and share your "bank" that way. I remember back in the day turning on transparency and sharing my goods in a bag in the local town Inn within my single account... yeah its a risk but its what you have to do. Dealwithit.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk
I said closest emulated thing... regardless, its not how UO is anyway. If you can't figure out how to share gold throughout your characters go play something else. It isn't rocket science.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk
How about there is more important things to worry about? What else do you want? Trammel? I'm sure the maintenence team isn't interested in making a diablo 3 bank system for you and the op.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk
It was never implemented into the game and hopefully never will be. People will abuse it and it takes away from the game. The biggest problem I can see is people exploiting it and duplicating currency thus ruining the game. There is alternate means to access gold across your accounts. What more do you want to be told? Make your own goddamn server with your brilliant dreams.
Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk