Thank you for listening
- Thread starter Blaine the Gypsy
- Start date
AreYouKidden
Grandmaster
Swampy damage reduction was also removed on aggro, or was originally? They targeted defense relic and swampy.
Blaine the Gypsy
Grandmaster
I've tested it a bit.
1: a player looting a blue corpse turns grey and you attack him. You do not lose your talisman abilities.
2: a player steals from you and you attack them. You do not lose your talisman abilities.
3: you attack a guild member. You do not lose talisman abilities.
1: a player looting a blue corpse turns grey and you attack him. You do not lose your talisman abilities.
2: a player steals from you and you attack them. You do not lose your talisman abilities.
3: you attack a guild member. You do not lose talisman abilities.
Zog'orium
Grandmaster
You try attacking a red?
baseball dad
Master
With all these bad changes can we atleast get another bad change reversed?
You know the one where mobs attack reds over blues regardless of your position?
You know the one where mobs attack reds over blues regardless of your position?
Lexington
Grandmaster
I believe this was changed back along time ago.
kolbycrouch
Master
i think swamp dragon should work.
slayer armor isnt terrible and i like the idea of more risk for more protection, but he mitigation is too high.
swampy 20% that also worked with firebreath is probably just right.
it also means you wouldnt take a giant beetle, so you probably couldnt dry-loot, which i think forces a little balance.
slayer armor isnt terrible and i like the idea of more risk for more protection, but he mitigation is too high.
swampy 20% that also worked with firebreath is probably just right.
it also means you wouldnt take a giant beetle, so you probably couldnt dry-loot, which i think forces a little balance.
Xiulan
Master
It's true that the topic had already been covered extensively and this whole fiasco could have been easily avoided, but I think Eppy deserves credit both for being against the nerf in the first place and for doing what he can to find a workable compromise now. Maybe if people don't nitpick him to death we'll see more changes that navigate the middle ground and aren't ham-fisted. And maybe we can finally move away from the whole "whine until you get your way" model.
Decreamos
Grandmaster
WRONG. Talismans were never meant to have any effect on pvp. You are fake news.
Lexington
Grandmaster
That's the way they all want it... red vs blue.
Lexington
Grandmaster
Alright Hillary... I guess eppy was full of shit then?!?!
StegcO
Grandmaster
IMO Original Sin was allowing reds to wear Talisman, not becouse Talisman on Reds is wrong in a universally way, but becouse now there are infinite thing to manage
red vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
red vs red disable1/disable2/disableboth
blue vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
grey vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
red vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
red vs red disable1/disable2/disableboth
blue vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
grey vs blue disable1/disable2/disableboth
ProdigyOsi
Grandmaster
Remove talismans from the game.
StegcO
Grandmaster
If staff remove talisman from the game werkt will dont have anymore an exscuse to stay 24/7 in a personal secluded map
ProdigyOsi
Grandmaster
I’m not sure what this means, but I like the sound of it!
StegcO
Grandmaster
it means werkt are playng UOF like it was Diablo3 rushing 24/7 RDA becouse scared of die playing with the rest of the community.
kolbycrouch
Master
Staff changed it from 50% mitigation to ~30-35% mitigation, and I believe it was shane who said it was an appropriate balance to pets.
Acknowledging a problem in a mechanic and then tweaking it would make one assume that they intended it to work that way.
Decreamos
Grandmaster
That 30-35% mitigation is across the board against everything? I have noticed my defense dexxer is more squishy!